Ben Kingsley Nails the Role of Eichmann in OPERATION FINALE

Adolf Eichmann on the left; Ben Kingsley in OPERATION FINALE on the right. What a movie!

Many years ago I read Mossad agent Peter Malkin’s book about the capture of Nazi fugitive Adolf Eichmann.  It was called EICHMANN IN MY HANDS, and it was a riveting read about a terrible situation.

The new movie, OPERATION FINALE, was everything I remember of the book come to life.  For anyone who may not already be familiar with this story, Eichmann was responsible for the murder of the Jews during World War II.  He was unrepentant at the end of the war, and beyond it, as only those without a shred of a conscience can be, and made sure he saved his own ass, fleeing (eventually) to Argentina.

It’s there that he’s identified – by a blind survivor!  The back story of that identification is detailed here and it’s fascinating.  Ultimately the state of Israel receives a report about the Nazi’s whereabouts, and sends a team to capture and retrieve him, with the hope of putting him on trial in front of the world.  How they pulled it off is the stuff good movies are made of.

I wasn’t aware, prior to seeing the movie, that Eichmann, long previously described as a bland functionary who was “just following orders,” was anything but.  He apparently gave lectures in Argentina on how, ahem, “well” he thought he’d done his job during the Nazi era.  It makes the portrait of him look even more complicated, and worse.

I’ve enjoyed watching Ben Kingsley playin other, infinitely more decent roles for decades, but how he handles the portrayal of the evil Eichmann is quite a sight to behold.  May he be nominated for an award for this one.

 

Advertisements

The Great American Op-Ed Whodunit

Who wrote the Op-Ed?

America has a new parlor game, folks!  It’s Who Wrote the Op-Ed?  It’s like playing a real-life game of CLUE, only doing so 2018-style.

I find the whole thing to be quite hilarious.  The facts (if you’ve managed to miss them over the past few hours) are these: somebody claiming to be a “top administration official” in the government wrote a piece in the New York Times, claiming to be working against the Trump regime from within.

First of all, since nobody will admit to writing the Op-Ed, nobody knows if the author in question is actually in the government or not.

Second, even if they are in the government, how do we know they really are a “top administration official?”

We don’t.  They didn’t sign their piece.

Third, how do we even know the whole thing isn’t a hoax?

Vice President Pence is a suspect, since he likes to use the word “lodestar,” and that word is in the Op-Ed.  It’s also got a lot of people who don’t know what the heck a lodestar is hitting their dictionaries and looking it up.

My guess is it definitely won’t turn out to be Pence.  It’s more likely somebody who knows he likes that buzz word and threw it into the Op-Ed for the sake of a little good, old-fashioned misdirection.

Another guess: Omarosa.  She just released a book about her time in the White House, and, since she no longer works there, she’s one person who doesn’t have to worry about being fired over it.

All I can say for sure is that I’m enjoying all this to the hilt.  As a country, we haven’t had a chance for this much fun since “Deep Throat” blew the whistle on Watergate.

 

 

The Strangest Facet of the Catholic Sex Abuse Scandal

Bravo to this whistleblower, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano!

I am as appalled as anyone else on this planet at the moment at the latest barrage of sex abuse accusations against clergy in the Catholic Church. I applaud the fellow pictured above, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, for writing a letter last weekend revealing just how far the cover-up of the abuse had gone.  According to Vigano, the Pope knew all about the allegations against Cardinal McCarrick and stupidly turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to it.

They say popes are infallible, but in this case?  “Infallible,” my foot!

Before I say anything else, I want to make my stance on the abomination of sexual abuse crystal clear.  If someone rapes a child, they belong in jail.  If someone rapes an adult, they belong in jail.  And if someone is ridiculous enough to try to help perpetrators cover up crimes of rape, they belong in jail, too.  Period, case closed.

Having clarified all that, there’s one aspect of these clergy abuse cases that I just cannot fathom on any level at all, let alone “get.”  It’s this.  Why did so many, many parents of so many raped children go to their archdiocese with their complaints of abuse and not straight to the police? 

It seems to me that if you have a little boy or girl, and that child has been violated in the worst manner possible by a priest, that constitutes a criminal act, folks, and criminal acts are supposed to be handled by the police.  The whole idea of parents running to their bishops or the principals of their child’s Catholic schools, or whoever in the church that they chose to run to instead, strikes me as just plain crazy.  Obviously the superiors of these monsters were not going to move to have them arrested.

It makes about as much sense as if someone were assaulted at work but ran screaming not to the cops but to the CEO.  Of course the CEO’s first thought, however erroneous, would be to try and sweep it all under the rug.

All the bishops seem to have done is transfer these disgraceful priests from one parish full of potential abuse victims to another, where the predator priests think they can behave with impunity and a sickening lack of moral fiber and decency.

Beyond having said that, I don’t know what to add.  It’s just too bizarre.  One article I recall reading ages ago stated that these predators are adept at not only picking out the most vulnerable child victims but the ones whose parents were most fanatically devoted to the Church.

Still, how many thousands of victims are we now talking about?  Am I supposed to believe they all came from parents who were over-the-top with awe at the Church?

If they didn’t report these incidents to the Church in the first place, the Church wouldn’t have had a chance to cover them up…

Why didn’t the parents go to the police?

 

 

 

 

The Folly of Arming Teachers

Talk about a disaster waiting to happen…

I get it: there is a desperate need in schools for measures to be put in place to keep everyone safe from intruders with guns.  It’s not that I don’t get it.

However, the idea of arming teachers with weapons makes my blood run cold.

I went to six different schools growing up.  Three of them were wonderful.  However, the other three had inappropriate people on their faculties that should have been put away for various forms of child abuse.

I recall four jerks who worked in one of the schools.  All four had severe drug or alcohol problems.  This information was shared with me, and with my parents, later, by former faculty members.  I say this so everyone will know it’s not just something I thought as a child.  In fact, as a child, I didn’t recognize that the insanity I was seeing from those four teachers was the result of substance abuse.  I just thought they were “crazy” or “weird” in a way I could not easily define, or at least, felt they were “off,” somehow.

They were “off,” all right.  If the Betty Ford Clinic had been operational in those days, all of them should have been sent there, and the ones who were using illegal drugs in addition to booze should have been indicted, besides.

I witnessed corporal punishment in a Catholic school I attended briefly where children were beaten and slapped around for the slightest minor infraction.  Lots of people talk about how horrible the nuns were in Catholic schools.  If there’s anything worse than a nun wielding a ruler, it can only be a nun with a gun.

Even in one of the best of the schools I attended there are two teachers who come to mind immediately as having been too wacky to belong there.  Legend had it that one of them, before my time at the school, got mad at a sassy student.  So…he picked up a chair and threw it through a window.  Lovely!  Another was a relentlessly nosy woman who kept trying to get into other people’s business, even though there was no provocation for her to do so.  She just seemed to like putting people in pigeon-holes.  I later heard through the grapevine that Miss Butt-Inski was given an honest-to-God diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder by her psychiatrist.  She was about as emotionally stable as a dandelion seed in a gale-force wind.

The idea of any one of these born losers being handed a gun to “defend the school” is nothing less than absurd, and it’s terrifying besides.  Keep in mind, the examples I site here are just of the worst teachers I remember, the rock bottom group.  They’re not the only concern.  Even one of the best sort of teachers might just be tempted to lock and load on a bad day when the kiddies are too unruly.

Yes, something does need to be done to insure the safety of the kids as they return to school.   Like I said, I get it.  I even agree with it.  Safety measures need to be put in place, and pronto.  But I just don’t get why anyone would want any of these worst-case-scenario maniacs who somehow managed to slip through the cracks and become “teachers” to be defending our children with loaded firearms.  If this nonsense is the trend of the future, I hope to see the expansion of efforts for more kids to be home-schooled.

Nuns with guns? God help us!

Another Guilty Party in the Shameful THREE IDENTICAL STRANGERS Saga: Yale University!

The three identical triplets who were torn apart for a shameful psychology experiment.

This is a follow-up to my previous blog post about the outrageous movie THREE IDENTICAL STRANGERS, which shocked me to the core when I saw it over the past weekend.

To briefly recap, three identical triplets, given up for adoption in 1961, were pawns in a crazy experiment about “nature vs. nurture.”  The boys were deliberately separated with the help of an adoption agency, placed with different adoptive parents, were never told about one another, and were studied, even filmed, by a team of psychologists for years – without ever being told they were part of a study!  They weren’t the only set of multiple births who were used in the experiment, either.  Thirteen children apparently were thus misused.

Culprits were one Dr. Peter Neubauer, who was conducting research in to “nature vs. nurture” by splitting up the siblings, the Louise Wise Adoption Agency, who worked hand in hand with him, the Jewish Board of Family and Children’s Services, and more.  The Jewish Board has plenty of information about all this but they’re not disclosing it, not even to the now-grown children who were pawns in this creepy game.

I tore the Jewish Board of Family and Children’s Services a new one (you know what kind of one I mean) after seeing the movie.  They didn’t just get to be the subject of a blog post.  I also sent them THE MOTHER of all complaint emails.  The Jewish Board, of course, won’t deign to respond, but so what?   The point is that the more people who write and complain about this, the sooner some positive action might be taken, albeit egregiously belated.

Yale University is going to hear from me, too.  Yale is also involved.  They are now the keeper of the records of these experiments, which have apparently been seriously redacted.  The findings were never published.  The name of the sadistic person/persons/organization who funded the damned thing have never been revealed, either, and Yale, as well as the Jewish Board, happen to be in possession of that information.  The Jewish Board controls the papers that are sitting at Yale; they don’t want most of the records released, for some reason.  This is a case where one absurdity piles up on top of another, and another, and another.  Meanwhile, there are children who were involved who still don’t know they have a twin or a triplet out there, somewhere.

It’s on longer the dark ages of the early 1960s, folks.  It’s 2018, and studies like this one are no longer allowed.  Experimenting on people as though they were lab rats is a thing of the past.  This barbarism wouldn’t fly in the present at the Yale Medical School, so why are most of the records allowed to be covered up by the Yale Library?

Everybody who is covering this thing up, no doubt because they’re all afraid of being sued, DESERVES to be sued.  Whether they were personally involved way back when or not, they deserve to be sued for their ridiculous refusal to do the right thing about this mess, here and now.

Hey, Yale University, and the Jewish Board of Family and Children’s Services: People left the movie theater comparing this experiment to the ones perpetrated on multiples by the notorious Dr. Josef Mengele in Auschwitz concentration camp.  Are you aware of that?  People in theaters all over the country are walking out comparing everyone involved to Josef Mengele!  That includes those invovled after the fact.  Do any of you think you could possibly look any worse?

Follow the money, I say!  Whoever financed the initial experiment is probably also paying for the continued silence around it.

 

 

Johanna Reiss, Author of THE UPSTAIRS ROOM, Gets KNIGHTED in Holland!

Author Johanna Reiss wearing the medal of her new title: KNIGHT!

Here is the latest news on my friend, Johanna Reiss, Holocaust survivor and Author of THE UPSTAIRS ROOM, THE JOURNEY BACK and A HIDDEN LIFE.  She’s been knighted!

Johanna’s new title is Knight in the Order of Orange-Nassau.  (In Dutch, it’s Ridder in de Orde van Oranje-Nassau, orange being the official color of the Dutch royal house.)  The honor comes from the royal family.  She was given the honor on behalf of King by the mayor of her old hometown, Winterswijk, during her recent trip to Holland.

Johanna’s book, THE UPSTAIRS ROOM, the one I keep saying needs to be made into a movie, tells the true story of her childhood as a Jewish child hiding from the Nazis and the circumstances leading up to it.  She had to wear a yellow star.  She wasn’t permitted to go to school with non-Jewish children.  Some of those non-Jewish kids bullied her relentlessly.  The Nazis who occupied Holland not only encouraged the bullying of Jewish children, they applauded it.  Her father found a place for Johanna, then called “Annie,” to hide, along with her sister, Sini; he and another sister were hidden in different locations.  Johanna was in hiding for two years, seven months and one more day, first with one courageous family, the Hanninks, then at a farmhouse with another, the Oostervelds.  All four members of Annie’s immediate family survived the war, as a result of the actions of their helpers.  She’s been called “The Anne Frank of Gramercy Park” in New York City, with the difference being that this was a hidden child who made it.

THE UPSTAIRS ROOM has not only been in continuous print since 1972 but has been the subject of Johanna’s many wonderful speaking engagements, where her talks inspire both children and adults  to have tolerance for other people’s differences and not follow anyone who tells them to hate.  She has spoken to groups all over the United States and in Europe, and for that reason, it was decided, in Holland, that she should be made a Knight.  How cool is that?

And here is a special message for any other child who’s being bullied, or is living through extreme times.  You never know what tomorrow may bring.  Look what it brought to Johanna: Authorship and even an unexpected Knighthood!  “You just have to make it to tomorrow first,” Johanna says.  The sun came out for this Annie!

The Knighthood ceremony is in Dutch, and can be seen here:  https://youtu.be/i1s7uP4rPFk

 

Who Financed the Sinister Study Shown in the Movie “THREE IDENTICAL STRANGERS”?

 

What kind of sadists would separate triplets at birth?

I remember the story of the separated triplets who found each other from the time it happened back in 1980.

A boy named Robert Shafran went to his college for the first time and was immediately mistaken for another boy named Eddy.  One of Eddy’s friends asked Robert if he was adopted and when his birthday was.  It was enough for them to figure out that Eddy Galland, also adopted and with the same birthday, was Robert’s identical twin.

Shortly after the newspapers got wind of the miraculous reunion, another brother, David Kellman, also adopted into yet another family, recognized himself in the photos of Robert and Eddy.  They weren’t twins.  The three were triplets.

It was a wonderful story but…why had the boys been separated and placed with different families in the first place?

In the chilling documentary, THREE IDENTICAL STRANGERS, which I saw earlier today, the case is examined in detail but without much resolution.  The boys were all adopted through a thankfully now-defunct agency called Louise Wise Services.  They were part of a psychological study allowed by the agency, along with the Jewish Board of Family and Children Services, that they had never agreed to participate in and did not know was going on.  Their adoptive parents were told “all children” being adopted at that time were being followed by psychologists, but without any viable explanation, then – or now.

This sick study was engineered by one Dr. Peter Neubauer.  Neubauer’s team followed all three boys, and treated them as no more than human lab rats, relentlessly visiting them in their homes and testing them over the years, and even putting the tests on film, yet.  The study may have been on “nature versus nurture,” a concept that psychologists in the 1960s, when the experiment began, were obsessed with.  As one of this Dr. Neubauer’s former assistants says in the movie, it’s “scary” to think genetics plays a role in who children become.

Scary for her, perhaps.  Scary for this Dr. Neubauer too, no doubt.  But would the three identical triplets have considered it “scary” that they had a lot in common had they been allowed to be raised together, rather than separated and put into different homes by the awful people running the Louise Wise Agency?

Lest anyone think I’m exaggerating when I call the Louise Wise Agency dolts “awful,” there’s more.  When the boys found each other, their parents went to confront the agency to find out why they were separated.  The meeting took place on a rainy night.  They were given vague answers to their questions.  When one father went back into the agency afterwards because he forgot his umbrella, he found the jerks from the meeting toasting one another with champagne, “As if,” he says, “they’d just dodged a bullet.”

Indeed, they had.  For it wasn’t just these triplets who were separated.  So were a bunch of sets of identical twins placed by the same accursed agency, who, to this day, might not know they have a twin out there somewhere!

More evasions were given to the question of who financed this hideous study.  Obviously there was money behind it, since the separated siblings were followed for years by the psychological team, and even put on film.  Who paid for it?  “Private donors from Washington” was the only answer the triplets and their parents could get, and that sounds blatantly ridiculous.  For one thing, the Louise Wise Agency and the Jewish Board of Family and Children’s Services were New York, not Washington, organizations…

The Jewish Board of Family and Children’s Services could not possibly look any worse than they do at this moment, with this award-winning movie in the theaters, raising disturbing questions that have yet to be answered.  They used these children in an experiment, for God’s sake.  It’s atrocious!  So I’d like to know, first and foremost:

What was the full purpose behind this idiotic study?

When are they going to tell the separated twins who were also unwitting participants in this debacle that they have a twin?

And who the Hell financed the sinister study that led triplets and twins to be raised separately in a “nature versus nurture” experiment in the first place?